Case 3201348/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Lascelles v NCF Furnishings Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201348/2019
- Decision date
- 16 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Members
- Panel members
- Mrs B Saund, Mr T Burrows
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Lascelles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote remedies hearing on 12 November 2020 before Employment Judge McLaren with members Mrs B Saund and Mr T Burrows. The respondent conceded liability, so the tribunal was concerned only with remedy. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr M Lascelles, was awarded £37,725.
The judgment itemises the award as £6,500 for loss of bonus commission for November and December 2018, £2,271.41 for loss of earnings for 22 days based on a gross weekly pay of £516.23, £25,000 for injury to feelings, and £4,980 interest on injury to feelings calculated at 8% for 909 days. The text states that these amounts together produce the stated award, although the listed figures do not arithmetically match the total stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | This is a remedies judgment after the respondent conceded liability. The judgment states a total award of £37,725, but the itemised sums listed in the text appear to total £38,751.41. | Upheld | Race | £37,725 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £37,725
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £8,771
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.