Case 3201349/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Alam v Rossmore Hotel Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201349/2019
- Decision date
- 8 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Alam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Burgher heard the case at the East London Hearing Centre on 19 September 2019, 18 October 2019 and 8 January 2020. The judgment records that Mr R Alam’s claim for automatic unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed.
The tribunal upheld Mr Alam’s monetary claims for unpaid salary, unpaid notice pay and unpaid accrued holiday pay. It found that March 2019 salary was unpaid and ordered Rossmore Hotel Limited to pay £552.00. It also ordered payment of £127.40 for notice pay and £188.14 for accrued holiday pay, producing a total award to the claimant of £867.54.
The judgment also records a separate costs order against Mr Alam: he was ordered to pay Rossmore Hotel Limited £350.00 in respect of the costs of the adjournment on 18 October 2019.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers to this as a claim for automatic unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded in respect of unpaid salary for March 2019. | Upheld | — | £552 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded for unpaid notice pay. | Upheld | — | £127 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for unpaid accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £188 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £868
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.