Case 3201352/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Jimmy Sparks Respondent 40TUDE Ltd (Formerly J&M Insurances Services (UK) Ltd v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201352/2020
- Decision date
- 15 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sugarman Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Jimmy Sparks Respondent 40TUDE Ltd (Formerly J&M Insurances Services (UK) Ltd
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent’s name to 40TUDE Ltd, following the company’s change of name from J&M Insurance Services (UK) Ltd. It then dealt with two claims: the claim for a statutory redundancy payment and the unfair dismissal claim. The redundancy payment claim was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The judgment records that the claimant was unfairly dismissed pursuant to ss95, 98 and 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal then applied a 20% Polkey deduction to the compensatory award to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event.
The respondent was ordered to pay £8,079.20 as compensation for unfair dismissal. The breakdown shows a basic award of £0, a past loss of earnings figure of £9,099 reduced by the 20% Polkey deduction to £7,279.20, and non-prescribed loss of £800 after deducting 20% from the claimed £1,000 for loss of statutory rights and job-search expenses. The recoupment regulations were said to apply, with a prescribed element of £7,279.20 and the excess over that element of £800.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claim for a statutory redundancy payment was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim succeeded under ss95, 98 and 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The compensatory award was reduced by 20% to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event. | Upheld | — | £8,079 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,079
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £8,079
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey deduction
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.