Case 3201361/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Rosita Sodano v Pink Crust Ltd trading as Beaut Box — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201361/2022
- Decision date
- 15 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Elgot Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Rosita Sodano
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal removed Ms Y Onur and Ms H Amoateng as parties because they were not the claimant's employer. It found that the correct sole respondent was Pink Crust Limited trading as Beaut Box.
The claimant's unpaid wages claim succeeded. The tribunal accepted that she had worked 47 hours as a Senior Beauty Therapist between 25 November 2021 and 18 December 2021, at a contractual hourly rate of £14. On that basis it awarded £658 gross, payable by the respondent within 28 days, and stated that the respondent was not entitled to make any deductions from that sum.
The judge treated an email from the claimant to the respondent's legal representative, copied to the tribunal and dated 9 October 2022, as a properly itemised schedule of loss. No separate remedy breakdown was given beyond the single award of £658 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment described this as a claim for unpaid wages. The tribunal awarded £658 gross, representing 47 hours at £14 per hour, payable within 28 days. | Upheld | — | £658 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £658
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.