Case 3201373/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Adegboye v UPS limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201373/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Adegboye
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe complaints of unfair dismissal and redundancy were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
The tribunal found that the complaint of arrears of pay had been issued outside the time limits in section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994. It found that it had been reasonably practicable for the complaint to have been issued within time.
The tribunal refused the claimant's application to add a disability discrimination complaint under the Equality Act 2010. It found that the application had been brought out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment describes a complaint of Redundancy as dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; the precise redundancy cause of action is not further particularised. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to a complaint of arrears of pay and finds it was issued outside the applicable time limits. Classification as unlawful deduction from wages is based on the reference to section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, but the judgment also refers to the Extension of Jurisdiction Order. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant's application to add a disability discrimination complaint was refused because it was out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994
- not just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.