Case 3201383/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Stubbs v Gable Essex Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201383/2022
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr N Stubbs
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Acting Regional Employment Judge Burgher on 31 October 2022. The Claimant, Mr N Stubbs, appeared in person. The second respondent was represented by counsel. The hearing was conducted by CVP and was not objected to by the parties.
The Claimant's disability discrimination claim against the second respondent was dismissed on withdrawal, and his unlawful deduction of wages claim against the second respondent was also dismissed on withdrawal. His 'Health and Safety' breach claims against the second respondent were struck out because the Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider them and that the claims had no reasonable prospect of success.
As a result, the second respondent, Apetito Limited, was dismissed from the proceedings. The Judgment stated that it did not affect the Claimant's complaints against the first respondent, Gable Essex Ltd, which were to be listed for a separate preliminary hearing to consider the claims and make case management orders for final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim against the second respondent was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim against the second respondent was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The Claimant's 'Health and Safety' breach claims against the second respondent were struck out because the Tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to consider them and that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.