Case 3201385/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Chloe Ewenson v E H Jewellers Ltd. formerly known as Emson Haig Limited T/a Emson Haig (in creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201385/2023
- Decision date
- 9 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Chloe Ewenson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Chloe Ewenson, succeeded on all three monetary claims heard by Employment Judge C Lewis at the East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 5 February 2024. The respondent, E H Jewellers Ltd formerly known as Emson Haig Limited t/a Emson Haig (in creditors voluntary liquidation), did not attend. Oral reasons were given at the hearing and the written record states that no written reasons will be provided unless requested.
On wages, the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for the period 22 May 2023 to 26 June 2023. It ordered the respondent to pay £3,288, described as five weeks at £548 per week, being the gross sum deducted. The tribunal noted that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance on that amount.
The tribunal also upheld the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay and awarded £548 as damages. It recorded that the figure was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. The holiday pay complaint was also well-founded: the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because the claimant had not been paid for holidays accrued but untaken when employment ended, and it ordered payment of £328.80, again with tax or National Insurance to be dealt with by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 22 May 2023 to 26 June 2023 and awarded the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £3,288 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the notice pay claim and awarded damages calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax being payable as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £548 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for accrued but untaken holiday on termination. | Upheld | — | £329 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,165
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.