Case 3201401/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Leroy Rowe v London Borough of Waltham Forest — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201401/2018
- Decision date
- 18 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs M Legg, Dr J Ukemenam
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Leroy Rowe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the hearing took place at East London Hearing Centre over nine days in November 2021. It began as an in-person hearing but was converted to a video hearing on the fourth day because it was not practicable to continue face to face after the third day.
The judgment states only the outcome of the claims. Mr Rowe's claims for unfair dismissal, race discrimination and unlawful victimisation failed and were dismissed. No reasons or remedy findings are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the race discrimination claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment describes this as unlawful victimisation and states that the claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.