Case 3201414/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Grimwood v Acer Landscapes Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201414/2022
- Decision date
- 15 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Grimwood
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for a hearing at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 15 September 2022 before Employment Judge E Fowell. Neither party attended. The judgment records that the claimant had written to the Tribunal saying he did not propose to attend because the respondent was in liquidation.
On that basis, the Tribunal ordered that the claim be dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure for non-attendance of parties. The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying dispute and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses the claim under Rule 47 because neither party attended the hearing. The text does not specify the underlying claim type(s) beyond the case listing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.