Case 3201418/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Dingwall v Dabbl Invest Ltd and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201418/2023
- Decision date
- 12 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms S Dingwall
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningRegional Employment Judge Burgher heard Ms S Dingwall's claim at the East London Hearing Centre on 11 January 2024. The judgment found that her employer was Dabbl Invest Ltd and that she had constructive notice of her redundancy and termination of employment on 6 December 2023 following conversations with HMRC.
The claimant's claims for redundancy payment, unpaid wages, and notice pay succeeded against Dabbl Invest Ltd. The tribunal ordered Dabbl Invest Ltd to pay a total of £17,876.14, made up of £1,538.82 redundancy pay, £14,114.56 unpaid wages (net) for 1 June 2023 to 6 December 2023, and £2,222.76 unpaid notice pay (net).
The claims against Dabbl Group Ltd were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Award made against Dabbl Invest Ltd; claims against Dabbl Group Ltd were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £1,539 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages (net) for 1 June 2023 to 6 December 2023. | Upheld | — | £14,115 |
| Other | Unpaid notice pay (net); no separate legal label is stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,223 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,876
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.