Case 3201423/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Colin Brown v Hyden UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201423/2023
- Decision date
- 11 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Allen Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Colin Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 10 January 2024, before Employment Judge F Allen at East London Hearing Centre by CVP, the tribunal found that Mr Colin Brown had been unfairly dismissed by Hyden UK Limited. The judgment is a short liability decision and does not set out any monetary award at this stage.
The tribunal also recorded that Mr Brown was wrongfully dismissed and that his claim for breach of contract succeeds. Remedy was not determined in this decision. The judge stated that entitlement to remedy would be decided at the remedy hearing listed for 20 February 2024 at 10:00 for one day, together with the Claimant’s complaint in respect of holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability was found on 10 January 2024; remedy was deferred to the listed remedy hearing on 20 February 2024. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment recorded that the Claimant was wrongfully dismissed and that his claim for breach of contract succeeds; remedy was to be determined later. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.