Case 3201428/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Jatkonyte v Biel Consultancy Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201428/2022
- Decision date
- 10 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Jatkonyte
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing and was not represented. The tribunal proceeded under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, considered the information available to it, and made such enquiries as were practicable before determining the case. It found that the claimant was aware the matter had been listed for hearing and had been given an opportunity to explain her failure to attend or be represented, but did not do so.
The claimant's claims for breach of contract and unlawful deduction of wages were dismissed. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any separate remedy findings on those claims.
The respondent's counterclaim for breach of contract was withdrawn by the respondent. The tribunal recorded that counterclaim as dismissed following withdrawal, pursuant to Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claimant's breach of contract claim; the tribunal dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim; the tribunal dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Respondent's counterclaim for breach of contract was withdrawn by the respondent and then recorded by the tribunal as dismissed following withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- Rule 52 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.