Case 3201435/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mark Petherick v Elm Surfacing Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201435/2017
- Decision date
- 10 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mark Petherick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMark Petherick was employed by Elm Surfacing Ltd as a Sweeper Driver and was dismissed on 20 September 2020 after a drug test taken on 10 September 2020 reported cocaine and benzoylecgonine. The respondent said the dismissal was for gross misconduct. The claimant denied ever using cocaine and said the testing and disciplinary process was flawed.
The tribunal applied section 98 ERA 1996 and the range of reasonable responses test. It accepted that the respondent genuinely believed the claimant was guilty of misconduct, but held that it did not have reasonable grounds for that belief and that the belief was not based on a reasonable investigation. The tribunal found that sterile gloves were not used when the samples were taken, that the claimant's medication was not passed to Hampton Knight, and that the respondent had not provided completed consent or chain-of-custody forms.
The tribunal also found that the claimant denied cocaine use at the disciplinary meeting on 16 September 2020 and said he did not know how the test could have been positive unless it was due to the medication he was taking. It accepted his evidence that he asked for a hearing to put his own evidence forward but was told the matter was concluded. It also found that he was not offered the chance to have the second sample analysed and was denied an appeal. Judgment on remedy was deferred to a later hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability only. The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim but directed a separate hearing on remedy, including mitigation and whether compensation should be reduced because of the claimant's verbally abusive behaviour on 10 September 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- Shrestha v Genesis Housing Association Ltd
- A v B
- ACAS Code of Practice
- Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.