Case 3201445/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Joanna Klonowska–Socha v Falck UK Ambulance Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201445/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Speker
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs M Legg, Mr L Bowman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Joanna Klonowska–Socha
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Joanna Klonowska-Socha brought a claim against Falck UK Ambulance Services Limited that was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 18, 19 and 20 August 2020 before Employment Judge Speker, OBE DL, sitting with Mrs M Legg and Mr L Bowman. The judgment identifies the claim as direct discrimination on the grounds of disability.
The tribunal’s unanimous decision was that the claim had not been established, and it was dismissed. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of direct discrimination on the grounds of disability was not established and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.