Case 3201455/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Khorenzhaia v All Saints Retail Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201455/2019
- Decision date
- 24 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Khorenzhaia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Khorenzhaia claimed that All Saints Retail Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from her final salary by retaining 50% of visa-related costs after she resigned. The tribunal found that she had received a revised offer letter on 3 November 2017 setting out a clawback clause for visa expenses if she left within two years, and that clause 6.2 of her contract also allowed deductions from salary for monies due. It found that she signed the revised offer letter at the start of her employment and had previously signified in writing her agreement to the deduction.
The tribunal accepted that some costs had originally been deducted incorrectly, including 50% of the Immigration Skills Charge and the Certificate of Sponsorship fee, but found that this was a genuine mistake. It recorded that the Respondent refunded those sums once the error was identified. It also found that the remaining deduction was for 50% of the correct visa expenses, calculated after those items were removed, and that the relevant contractual trigger was the Claimant’s resignation on 21 March 2019, less than two years after her employment began.
Applying section 13(1) and section 13(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and referring to Potter v Hunt Contracts Limited, the tribunal held that the deduction was authorised by a written contractual provision and that the Claimant had agreed to it before the event that triggered it occurred. It further held that any issue about the Respondent’s Home Office licence was a separate matter and did not invalidate the contract between employer and employee. The unlawful deduction claim was therefore dismissed, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned the deduction from final salary of 50% of visa-related costs under the revised offer letter and clause 6.2 of the contract. The tribunal accepted that the Respondent had initially deducted 50% of the Immigration Skills Charge and the Certificate of Sponsorship fee in error, but found those sums were refunded and did not invalidate the contractual deduction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13(6) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Potter v Hunt Contracts Limited
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.