Case 3201456/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Gheysarani v Sunny Ventures Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201456/2019
- Decision date
- 18 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Gheysarani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment against Sunny Ventures Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages for the period 28 March to 30 April 2019, and entered judgment for £2,416.67 on that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was not entitled to notice pay because he had been employed for only one month, so that aspect of the claim failed. The holiday pay claim succeeded, and judgment was entered for £278.85, representing 2.5 days’ holiday pay.
The total sum recorded in the judgment is £2,695.52, being the combined amount of the successful wages deduction and holiday pay claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for 28 March to 30 April 2019. | Upheld | — | £2,417 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay failed because the tribunal found the claimant had been employed for only one month. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim succeeded for 2.5 days. | Upheld | — | £279 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,696
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.