Case 3201457/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Debrick v Alistair Keeble t/a Alistair Keeble Solicitors and 3 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201457/2018
- Decision date
- 7 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs BK Saund, Mr P Quinn
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mrs F Debrick
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at the East London Hearing Centre on 6 and 7 August 2019 before Employment Judge Burgher, with members Mrs BK Saund and Mr P Quinn. The judgment dated 7 August 2019 records the parties' agreement of terms of settlement under a COT3.
Because the matter had been settled, the tribunal did not record findings on liability or remedy. The judgment states that the Claimant's claims were dismissed, and it gives no further reasons or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that, following agreement of terms of settlement under a COT3, the Claimant's claims were dismissed. No merits findings are given. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that, following agreement of terms of settlement under a COT3, the Claimant's claims were dismissed. No merits findings are given. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.