Case 3201462/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Welford-Costelloe v Travtus Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201462/2019
- Decision date
- 6 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis
- Venue
- East London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Welford-Costelloe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Employment Tribunal on 6 September 2019 before Employment Judge C Lewis sitting alone. The claimant, Mr D Welford-Costelloe, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent, Travtus Limited, was represented by its director and co-founder. The judgment records no substantive evidence or findings on the merits of the underlying complaints.
Because the claimant failed to attend the hearing, the tribunal dismissed his complaints of failure to pay notice pay and failure to pay holiday pay under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No remedy was awarded and no monetary figure is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for failure to pay notice pay dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the hearing on 6 September 2019. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for failure to pay holiday pay dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the hearing on 6 September 2019. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.