Case 3201462/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Comfort v AGS Castings Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3201462/2022
- Decision date
- 2 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Comfort
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London East Employment Tribunals on 12 May 2022. The Respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 21. The judgment was dated 2 November 2023 by Regional Employment Judge Burgher.
On the claimant’s representative’s email of 15 August 2023, and without any response from the Respondent, the tribunal ordered payment of two sums. First, it found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant’s wages and awarded £5,677.54. Second, it recorded that the Respondent had failed to provide a written statement of particulars and awarded £2,284.00.
The total sum ordered was £7,961.54. The remedy hearing listed for 21 November 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,678 |
| Other | The judgment records an award for failing to provide a written statement of particulars. No separate statutory label was given in the text, so this is classified as other. | Upheld | — | £2,284 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,962
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.