Case 3201470/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Thomas Christopher Tatham v Kenson Civils & Highways Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201470/2023
- Decision date
- 16 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Travers Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Thomas Christopher Tatham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 10 January 2024 before Employment Judge H Travers, the tribunal found that Mr Thomas Christopher Tatham was unfairly dismissed by Kenson Civils & Highways Limited. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a consultant from Wirehouse.
The extracted judgment does not set out the tribunal's reasoning for the unfair dismissal finding, but it does record the outcome in express terms. The tribunal therefore determined liability on the unfair dismissal claim in the claimant's favour.
The judgment also states that remedy was to be determined in accordance with attached orders. No monetary figure or remedy breakdown appears in the extracted text, so no award can be extracted from this judgment alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent. No monetary award is recorded in the extracted text; remedy was to be determined in accordance with attached orders. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.