Case 3201472/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Silov v Ilford Electrical Limited t/a Ilford Electrical Supplies — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201472/2019
- Decision date
- 5 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Prichard Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Silov
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim by Mr M Silov against Ilford Electrical Limited t/a Ilford Electrical Supplies was listed at East London Hearing Centre on 16 September 2019 before Employment Judge Prichard. The claimant was neither present nor represented. The respondent appeared through Mr A Chana, described in the judgment as owner director.
The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the wage-deduction complaint. Instead, applying rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, it dismissed the claim because the claimant did not attend the hearing. The written judgment records only that the claim was dismissed on non-attendance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed on non-attendance by the claimant under rule 47; it does not determine the underlying merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.