Case 3201480/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Sasha Abrahams v London Borough of Newham — 2025
- Case reference
- 3201480/2023
- Decision date
- 2 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Member
- Panel members
- Ms P. Alford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Sasha Abrahams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard claims by Sasha Abrahams against the London Borough of Newham at the London East Hearing Centre (by CVP) between 28 April and 2 May 2025, before Employment Judge G. King sitting with Ms P. Alford. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by Ms S. Sullivan, solicitor.
The tribunal found that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed it, and likewise dismissed the claim of discrimination arising from disability under s.15 of the Equality Act 2010. The claim of victimisation succeeded in part, specifically in relation to the allegation of 20 December 2022; the remaining victimisation allegations were not well founded and were dismissed.
In respect of the successful element, the tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £2,000.00 for injury to feelings, together with interest from 20 December 2022 of £378.74, giving a total sum payable of £2,378.74. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record indicates that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Tribunal found the claim of unfair dismissal not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim of discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Succeeded in part, in relation to the allegation of 20 December 2022. Other allegations were dismissed. Award of £2,000 for injury to feelings attributed to this claim; interest of £378.74 also payable from 20 December 2022. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,379
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.