Case 3201489/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M. Burkett v L and RG Logistics Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201489/2019
- Decision date
- 6 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M. Burkett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present an ET3 response by 5 July 2019, and the judgment was entered under Rule 21. The tribunal also amended the respondent’s name to L and RG Logistics Limited.
The claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the tribunal said it lacked jurisdiction to hear it. No further reasoning on that claim is set out in the extracted text.
The tribunal upheld the wage claim. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay £480 gross. The judgment states that any liability for tax on that sum lies with the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal said it lacked jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim, so it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £480 gross; liability for tax was left to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £480
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.