Case 3201500/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Folarin v A & T (UK) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201500/2019
- Decision date
- 10 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Prichard Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Folarin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 7 October 2019 before Employment Judge Prichard. Neither party attended, and the respondent had not presented an ET3 response. The judgment records that, on the parties not attending for the final hearing, the claimant's claim for arrears of pay was dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal did not make any substantive findings about whether arrears were owed, and no remedy was awarded. The record is limited to the dismissal of the claim in the claimant's absence and the respondent's absence.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that, on the parties not attending for the final hearing, the claimant's claim for arrears of pay was dismissed under Rule 47. No substantive determination of entitlement was recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.