Case 3201506/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Sam v Mitie Security Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201506/2018
- Decision date
- 30 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Sam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims for unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay. He said he had sought annual leave in July/August 2017, was granted 15 days, then became ill at the start of that period. He contended that he should have been allowed to take the lost leave later, and also complained about alleged unpaid shifts in September and November 2017.
The tribunal found from the payslips that the claimant had been paid during the relevant July to August 2017 period by a combination of statutory sick pay and holiday pay. It also recorded that the claimant's contract stated that holiday entitlement for one holiday year could not be taken in later holiday years unless agreed, and that untaken holiday would be forfeited without payment in lieu. The claimant was unable to state categorically that wages were owed for the later dates he identified.
On limitation, the tribunal found that the claim was issued in July 2018, well after the relevant events in 2017. It found there was no impediment preventing the claimant from bringing the claim in time, that it had been reasonably practicable for him to do so within the three-month time limit, and that the tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction. The tribunal also found that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and was bound to fail.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim included alleged unpaid shifts on 12 September 2017 and 10 November 2017. The tribunal found the claim was out of time, that it had no reasonable prospect of success, and that the claimant could not categorically state that wages were owed for the dates identified. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim concerned holiday pay and annual leave said to have been lost after the claimant became ill during a planned holiday period in July/August 2017. The tribunal found the claim was out of time, that it was reasonably practicable to present it within the statutory time limit, and that contractual terms precluded payment for accrued but unused holiday in the circumstances. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- Section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
- reasonably practicable
- Walls Meat Co Ltd v Khan
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Schulz v Esso Petroleum Ltd
- James W Cook & Co (Wivenhoe) Ltd v Tipper
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.