Case 3201506/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Harding v Precision K Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201506/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Harding
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under Rule 21 after the Respondent failed to file an ET3 within the time limit. The tribunal considered the information provided by the Claimant and held that the claim succeeded.
The judgment records that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages. It ordered payment of £845.16 in respect of the Claimant's last two weeks' pay.
The tribunal also awarded holiday pay of £1,317.85. That figure was calculated as £869.36 for the period 01/01/18 to 31/12/18, after deducting £1,500 already received in respect of holiday pay, and £448.49 for the period 01/01/19 to 10/03/19. The total net sum awarded was £2,161.01. The hearing listed for 16 September 2019 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and orders £845.16 in respect of the Claimant's last 2 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £845 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment awards £1,317.85 for holiday pay, made up of £869.36 for 01/01/18 to 31/12/18 and £448.49 for 01/01/19 to 10/03/19. | Upheld | — | £1,318 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,161
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.