Case 3201513/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Ojuade v RSM Top Jobs — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201513/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Ojuade
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the Claimant and Respondent on 28 August 2019 and found that the Claimant succeeded in her claim for reimbursement of the deduction from her wages described as 'Notice Pay Period' of 30 April 2019. The judgment does not record any other claim being determined.
Pursuant to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £2,138.88. No separate apportionment of that sum by head of loss is recorded, and the judgment does not include any award for injury to feelings, interest, or other remedy categories.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the Claimant succeeded in her claim for reimbursement of the deduction from her wages of 'Notice Pay Period' of 30 April 2019. | Upheld | — | £2,139 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,139
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.