Case 3201516/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Griggs v Trade Price Cars Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201516/2023
- Decision date
- 5 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Griggs
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing held remotely by video at East London Hearing Centre on 5 February 2024, before Employment Judge Shore, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The judgment records four claims: redundancy payment, holiday pay, breach of contract, and unauthorised deduction from wages.
The redundancy payment claim was dismissed because the claimant had less than two years' service with the respondent. The claims for holiday pay and breach of contract were also dismissed. No separate remedy was recorded for those dismissed claims.
The claim for unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded. The tribunal found it well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £5,258 gross, described as wages due and unpaid for the month of May 2023, before deduction of Income Tax and National Insurance. No additional remedy components were addressed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the claimant had less than two years' service with the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim well-founded and awarded £5,258 gross before deduction of Income Tax and National Insurance for wages due and unpaid for May 2023. | Upheld | — | £5,258 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,258
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.