Case 3201524/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Jobbin-Kazi v Kool Kidze Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201524/2021
- Decision date
- 9 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Members
- Panel members
- Mr Quinn, Mr Woodhouse
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Jobbin-Kazi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform on 1 October 2021, unanimously found that the correct identity of the respondent was Kool Kidze Limited. It held that the Claimant's claim of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and succeeded, with £360 identified as having been unlawfully deducted.
The tribunal also held that the Respondent failed to comply with the Claimant's right to be accompanied under section 10(2A) of the Employment Relations Act 1999, and that claim likewise succeeded. The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £600 under section 11 of that Act. The total award recorded in the judgment was £960.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that £360 had been unlawfully deducted from the Claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £360 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the Respondent failed to comply with the Claimant's right to be accompanied under section 10(2A) of the Employment Relations Act 1999 and awarded £600 under section 11. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £960
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.