Case 3201531/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Peter Hurley v South Hospitality Trading Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201531/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JONES Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Peter Hurley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSouth Hospitality Trading Ltd did not present a response by 22 July 2019 and did not apply for an extension of time. Employment Judge Jones therefore issued a Rule 21 judgment and vacated the hearing listed for 23 September 2019.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent had failed to pay Mr Peter Hurley his wages for 16 January to 20 February 2019, had failed to pay accrued holiday pay of 1.6 days, and had failed to make contractual pension payments. It also stated that the respondent had unlawfully deducted the claimant's wages.
The tribunal ordered payment of £2,307.69 for 5 weeks' wages, £738.46 for 1.6 days' holiday pay, and £29.94 for one month's pension contribution, making a total award of £3,076.09.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records unpaid wages for 16 January to 20 February 2019 and orders 5 weeks' wages at £2,307.69. | Upheld | — | £2,308 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records accrued holiday pay of 1.6 days and orders £738.46 for that head of loss. | Upheld | — | £738 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records a failure to make contractual pension payments and orders one month's pension contribution of £29.94. | Upheld | — | £30 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,076
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.