Case 3201532/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Eshan Suleman v Mr Ivan Mariacher T/as Elite Guarding — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201532/2020
- Decision date
- 27 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Eshan Suleman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by telephone before Employment Judge Tobin sitting alone on 24 May 2021. The judgment records that, after hearing from the claimant and the respondent's solicitor, the parties reached a settlement by consent.
The tribunal therefore did not determine the merits of the underlying claim. The judgment simply states that judgment was given in favour of the claimant for an agreed amount, and that the respondent was to pay £800 net.
No separate remedy breakdown, legal test, or substantive findings on liability are recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the parties reached a settlement by consent and that the respondent would pay the claimant £800 net. No liability findings were given. | Settled | — | £800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £800
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.