Case 3201538/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Thompson v A F & T N Clough t/a Springfield Dental Care — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201538/2019
- Decision date
- 8 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr J Webb, Mrs BK Saund
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Thompson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely at East London Hearing Centre on 2, 3 and 8 December 2020 before Employment Judge Burgher, with lay members Mr J Webb and Mrs BK Saund. It dismissed all of Ms S Thompson's claims against A F & T N Clough t/a Springfield Dental Care: public interest disclosure detriment, unfair constructive dismissal, wrongful dismissal, overtime, unlawful deduction of wages, and accrued but untaken holiday pay.
The judgment text provided records only those outcomes. It does not set out separate liability findings, reasoning, or any monetary award, and no remedy is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim is described only as "overtime" in the judgment text; the legal basis is not specified in the supplied extract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.