Case 3201539/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Not present and not represented For the v D K Villiers Dee Vee Logistic — 2025
- Case reference
- 3201539/2024
- Decision date
- 6 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Not present and not represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded in the absence of both parties under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The claimant had indicated by email on 29 December 2024, and then confirmed by telephone on 6 January 2025, that he would not attend the final hearing. The respondent did not communicate with the tribunal about its non-attendance.
No response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, the Employment Judge issued judgment under Rule 22 and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a statutory redundancy payment.
The amount awarded was 27 weeks at a gross weekly wage of £475, giving a total statutory redundancy payment of £12,825 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Judgment awards a statutory redundancy payment of 27 weeks at £475 gross weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £12,825 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,825
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.