Case 3201540/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Ward v Laville Limited t/a Brittania Pharmacy — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201540/2019
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs D Ward brought claims against Laville Limited t/a Brittania Pharmacy for breach of contract, unauthorised deduction from wages, and accrued and unpaid annual leave. The hearing took place at East London Hearing Centre on 28 November 2019 before Employment Judge Russell, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Miss B Thind of Human Resources.
The tribunal dismissed the breach of contract claim. It also dismissed the unauthorised deduction from wages claim.
The claim for accrued and unpaid annual leave succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £60.86.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim was for accrued and unpaid annual leave. | Upheld | — | £61 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £61
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.