Case 3201548/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Wayne Watson v Arriva London North Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201548/2019
- Decision date
- 14 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin Members
- Panel members
- Mr M Wood, Mr J Webb
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Wayne Watson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr Wayne Watson's claims against Arriva London North Limited at the East London Hearing Centre via Cloud Video Platform on 3 and 4 September 2020. The case was heard by Employment Judge G Tobin with members Mr M Wood and Mr J Webb.
The unanimous judgment was that Mr Watson was not unfairly dismissed pursuant to s94 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal also found that he was not discriminated against on the grounds of his race in breach of s13 Equality Act 2010.
As both claims failed, the Employment Tribunal proceedings were dismissed. The judgment does not record any remedy award or monetary compensation.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records the dispositive finding but does not set out detailed reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records the dispositive finding under s13 Equality Act 2010 but does not set out detailed reasons. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.