Case 3201559/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Natalie Allen v B2B Telemark Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201559/2019
- Decision date
- 9 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Natalie Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a defence and did not appear or have representation at the hearing. Employment Judge John Crosfill decided the matter on the claimant's ET1 and her oral evidence. The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for wages, including wages and commission, was well-founded under Part II of the Employment Rights Act, and that the holiday pay element was well-founded under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully deducted wages of £350 per week for the three weeks ending with 21 June 2019, totalling £1,150. It also found that commission at 10% on sales totalling £1,000 was due, amounting to £100. For holiday pay, the tribunal calculated annual leave accrued but untaken for the period 20 May 2019 to 21 June 2019 as £199.23, using the stated formula based on the claimant's weekly pay and commission.
The tribunal further found that the claimant incurred bank charges and interest of £15 as a direct consequence of the respondent's failure to pay wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,464.23 less any tax and national insurance contributions required by law.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions for wages of £1,150 for the three weeks ending 21 June 2019, commission of £100, and £15 for bank charges and interest caused by non-payment of wages. | Upheld | — | £1,265 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found holiday pay due for annual leave accrued but untaken for the period 20 May 2019 to 21 June 2019, assessed at £199.23. | Upheld | — | £199 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,464
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.