Case 3201577/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Khan v KK Security & FM Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201577/2022
- Decision date
- 7 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend or take part in the hearing. The tribunal recorded that it was satisfied the respondent knew the matter had been listed and, having been given an opportunity to explain its non-attendance, did not do so. The tribunal therefore proceeded in the respondent's absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for an unauthorised deduction from wages, and held that the holiday pay claim was well-founded. It also upheld the claim for failure to give a statement of employment particulars. The judgment does not set out any additional disputed factual findings beyond the determinations recorded in the judgment and remedy section.
At remedy, the tribunal awarded £2,160 for unauthorised deduction from wages, calculated as 240 hours at £9.00 per hour. It awarded £260.71 for holiday pay, calculated as 28.97 hours, being 240 hours x 12.07%, at £9.00 per hour. It also awarded £1,080 for the failure to give a statement of employment particulars, calculated as two weeks' pay using 120 hours at £9.00 per hour. The grand total awarded was £3,500.71, payable forthwith.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as 240 hours at £9.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £2,160 |
| Holiday pay | Described in the judgment as well-founded; awarded as 28.97 hours (240 hours x 12.07%) at £9.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £261 |
| Other | Failure to give statement of employment particulars; awarded as 2 weeks' pay (120 hours at £9.00 per hour). | Upheld | — | £1,080 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,501
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.