Case 3201578/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Christina Crawford v PM Construction Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201578/2019
- Decision date
- 11 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Christina Crawford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Christina Crawford was employed by PM Construction Ltd as a Construction Administrator from 4 March 2019, working 40 hours a week for £18,000 a year or £8.65 per hour. The tribunal found that she was not given a written statement of terms and conditions. It also rejected her evidence that she had been told she would receive unlimited full sick pay.
On holiday pay, the tribunal applied the Working Time Regulations and found that, over the period from 4 March 2019 to 11 April 2019, the claimant had accrued 3.12 days' holiday. After allowing for one day taken on 3 April 2019, it held that 2.12 days remained due, valued at £146.77.
On wages, the tribunal found shortfalls in the April 2019 pay: the claimant should have been paid for 8 days including the holiday taken on 3 April 2019, leaving a shortfall of £69.23, and there was a further shortfall of £28.77 against the amount shown on the payslip. It also found that the deduction of £40 for a replacement lock was not lawful under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because there was no written agreement to the deduction.
For the failure to provide written particulars, the tribunal applied section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 and ordered two weeks' pay, assessed at £692.31, having regard to the respondent being a small business and the circumstances at the time. The judgment records a total award of £977.07.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Accrued holiday pay. The tribunal found 2.12 days due at £69.23 per day. | Upheld | — | £147 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | April 2019 wage shortfalls of £69.23 and £28.77. | Upheld | — | £98 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Deduction for replacement lock. The tribunal found there was no written agreement under s.13 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £40 |
| Other | Two weeks' pay awarded under s.38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide written statement of particulars. | Upheld | — | £692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £977
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Working Time Regulations
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.