Case 3201596/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Z Williams v Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201596/2020
- Decision date
- 4 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Z Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dated 4 August 2020 records that Ms Z Williams brought claims against Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust. It states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The extracted text does not record any findings on liability, any merits-based conclusions, or any monetary award. No remedy is set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment text does not identify the individual claim heads; it states only that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not identify the individual claim heads; it states only that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not identify the individual claim heads; it states only that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The extracted judgment text does not identify the individual claim heads; it states only that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.