Case 3201612/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Lucas v SC Fitness Ltd – In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201612/2019
- Decision date
- 4 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Prichard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Lucas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 after SC Fitness Ltd, in creditors voluntary liquidation, failed to present an ET3 response by 9 August 2019 or at all. Ms A Lucas's claims therefore succeeded.
The judgment records that the claimant was awarded £1,975.00 in respect of arrears of pay, notice pay and holiday pay. The extracted text does not apportion that sum between the individual heads of claim, but it does record a single total award of £1,975.00.
The hearing listed for 14 October 2019 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awards a single lump sum for arrears of pay, notice pay, and holiday pay, but does not split the amount between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment awards a single lump sum for arrears of pay, notice pay, and holiday pay, but does not split the amount between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment awards a single lump sum for arrears of pay, notice pay, and holiday pay, but does not split the amount between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,975
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.