Case 3201614/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Miah v Zaara Leigh On Sea Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201614/2020
- Decision date
- 4 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Miah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Miah worked for Zaara Leigh On Sea Ltd as a chef from June 2019 under a verbal agreement for 24 hours per week at the National Minimum Wage. He was paid weekly in cash and received monthly pay statements. When the first national lockdown was announced on 22 March 2020, Mr Bari told him to go home because the restaurant was closing.
The tribunal found that Mr Miah remained entitled to be paid as normal because he was ready, willing and able to work. It accepted that he verbally agreed in April 2020 to accept the lower furlough-rate pay of £157.63 per week, but found that he was not paid at all after March 2020. Mr Bari’s account that he had paid him later in cash or by bank transfer was not accepted, and the documents produced did not corroborate the respondent’s account.
The tribunal rejected the respondent’s case that the employment ended on 31 May 2020, whether by resignation or notice. It found that no notice was given, that the P45 dated 31 May 2020 had not been shown to have been received by Mr Miah, and that his employment continued until at least 31 August 2020. Once he started new employment on 1 September 2020 he was no longer ready, willing and able to work for the respondent, so he was not entitled to pay after that date.
The result was an unlawful deduction from wages for the period 1 April 2020 to 31 August 2020, calculated at £157.63 per week for 21 weeks and 5 days, producing £3,404.81 gross. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of particulars of employment and made the statutory award of two weeks’ pay, being £315.26.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a series of unauthorised deductions from wages from 1 April 2020 until 31 August 2020, based on unpaid wages after March 2020. | Upheld | — | £3,405 |
| Other | Award made under section 38 Employment Act 2002 because the respondent had not provided a written statement of particulars of employment under section 1 ERA 1996; the tribunal awarded two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £315 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,720
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.1 ERA 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- ready, willing and able to work
- notice must be received to terminate employment
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.