Case 3201620/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Craig Houston v RSR Porscha UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201620/2020
- Decision date
- 31 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Knight Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Craig Houston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 26 May 2020, when the claimant was orally told he was being made redundant, rather than 31 March 2020 or 29 May 2020. It accepted the claimant's evidence that his employment had transferred under TUPE through Porsche Dynamics Ltd, Dynamic Automobiles Ltd, RSR Porscha Ltd, and then to RSR Porscha UK Ltd, and held that he had continuous employment from 5 January 2015 to 26 May 2020. On that basis, the tribunal found that he had the requisite 2 years' service and that it had jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal accepted the Respondent's case that the reason for dismissal was redundancy arising from the COVID-19 impact on the business, and it accepted that the Claimant could not be placed on the CJRS because he had not been put on PAYE in time, which it attributed to the Respondent or its accountant. However, it found the dismissal procedure unfair because there had been no warning of redundancy, no consultation, no evidence of a fair selection pool, and no consideration of alternative employment. It therefore upheld the unfair dismissal complaint. The tribunal made no basic award, and under Polkey it considered that any fair process would have taken at least 4 weeks, by which time the claimant had found alternative employment. The compensatory award was limited to £400 for loss of statutory protection and £200 for loss of the right to long notice, making £600 net, with no reduction for contributory fault and no ACAS adjustment.
On the remaining monetary claims, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed without notice and awarded £2,690 gross as damages for wrongful dismissal / breach of contract, based on 5 weeks' notice at the capped weekly rate of £538 gross. It also awarded £2,690 gross as redundancy pay on the same 5-week basis. For wages, the tribunal found that no payment had been made after 31 March 2020 although the employment continued to 26 May 2020, and awarded £5,516.13 gross for unpaid April wages and the proportion of May wages to the EDT. For holiday pay, it found that the claimant had taken only 1 day of leave in the 2020 leave year, had accrued approximately 2.057 weeks by the EDT, and had not been paid for that accrued holiday, so it awarded £1,424.18 gross. The total sums payable were £600 net plus £12,320.31 gross.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissal was found to be for redundancy, but the tribunal held the procedure unfair because there was no warning, consultation, fair selection pool, or consideration of alternative employment. The compensatory award was limited to £600 net. | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim for unpaid notice pay / breach of contract. The tribunal found the claimant had 5 years' continuous service and was entitled to 5 weeks' notice pay at the capped weekly rate of £538 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,690 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to 5 weeks' redundancy pay at the capped weekly rate of £538 gross, and that no redundancy payment had been made. | Upheld | — | £2,690 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found no wages had been paid after 31 March 2020 although employment continued to 26 May 2020. The award covered April wages of £3,000 and 26/31 of May wages (£2,516.13). | Upheld | — | £5,516 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had taken only 1 day of holiday in the 2020 leave year, had accrued about 2.057 weeks by the EDT, and had not been paid for the accrued holiday. | Upheld | — | £1,424 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,920
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £600
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
18 references- Rule 47 ET Rules of Procedure
- Roberts v Skelmersdale College
- TUPE Regulations 2006
- s.97 ERA 1996
- Stapp v Shaftesbury Society
- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.139 ERA 1996
- Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd
- R v British Coal Corporation
- Gwent County Council ex parte Bryant
- Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd
- Safeway Stores plc v Burrell
- Hollister v National Farmers' Union
- Polkey
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.27 ERA 1996
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.