Case 3201624/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Manneh v Grange Primary School — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201624/2023
- Decision date
- 11 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery On
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Manneh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Manneh’s case against Grange Primary School was heard at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 1 and 2 February 2024 before Employment Judge Emery. The judgment records two substantive outcomes: the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found to be well-founded, and the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed.
The decision does not set out written reasons, stating that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested. On the face of the written judgment, no remedy figure is recorded because remedy was left to a later hearing.
The tribunal listed a remedy hearing for 16 May 2024. No award, split award, or interest figure is included in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded. A remedy hearing was listed for 16 May 2024, so no award is recorded in this decision. | Upheld | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.