Case 3201625/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G. Parnis v MGW Groundworks Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201625/2023
- Decision date
- 5 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G. Parnis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr G. Parnis, brought a wages claim against MGW Groundworks Ltd. The respondent did not attend or take part in the hearing. Employment Judge Massarella found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal’s award was calculated at £5,900. The judgment explains that this figure represented 9 weeks at £700 net weekly, less £1,800 for two payments made by the respondent on 19 and 26 May 2023, and plus £1,400 for the notice period during which the claimant remained in employment. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the sum of £5,900 to the claimant in full and without deductions, and noted that the respondent must account to HMRC for tax and national insurance as applicable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and calculated the award as 9 weeks at £700 net weekly (£6,300), less £1,800 for two payments made on 19 and 26 May 2023, plus £1,400 for the notice period during which the claimant remained in employment. | Upheld | — | £5,900 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,900
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.