Case 3201641/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Y Yarrow v Crown World Wide Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201641/2020
- Decision date
- 16 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Y Yarrow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 19 March 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's orders dated 27 October 2020 and 17 February 2021, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
As a result of the strike out, the hearing listed for 23 to 25 June 2021 was vacated and did not take place. No merits findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not identify individual pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the case listing provided in the case context. The tribunal struck out the claim for failure to comply with tribunal orders and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify individual pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the case listing provided in the case context. The tribunal struck out the claim for failure to comply with tribunal orders and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify individual pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the case listing provided in the case context. The tribunal struck out the claim for failure to comply with tribunal orders and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.