Case 3201660/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Whiskin v Intrigue Homecare Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201660/2019
- Decision date
- 2 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Whiskin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L Whiskin brought a Working Time Regulations claim against Intrigue Homecare Limited. The tribunal, sitting at the East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge Gardiner on 30 September 2019, found that she was entitled to payment under regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for accrued but untaken annual leave when her employment ended.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,270.74, reflecting 11.8 days of accrued but untaken annual leave. No other claims, legal issues, or separate remedy components are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum under regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for 11.8 days of accrued but untaken annual leave at the end of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,271 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,271
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.