Mr I Morris v Morgan Hunt — 2021

Case reference: 3201670/2020
Decision date: 5 February 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Burgher JUDGMENT
Venue: East London Hearing Centre

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr I Morris

Respondent

Morgan Hunt

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal recorded that, by order dated 14 January 2021, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why his complaints of race discrimination, age discrimination and holiday pay should not be struck out. The reasons given were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's orders dated 24 September 2020 and 13 October 2020, and that the complaints had not been actively pursued.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	Struck out by judgment dated 5 February 2021 after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's order of 14 January 2021.	Struck out	Race	—
Age discrimination	Struck out by judgment dated 5 February 2021 after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's order of 14 January 2021.	Struck out	Age	—
Holiday pay	Struck out by judgment dated 5 February 2021 after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's order of 14 January 2021.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.