Case 3201699/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D. Rogers v United Services (Chingford) Club Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201699/2020
- Decision date
- 15 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D. Rogers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Rogers was employed as an assistant bar steward from 3 April 2019 on contractual rates of £10.50 per hour for Monday and Wednesday shifts and £8.50 per hour for Sunday bar work, later increased to £8.72 from 1 April 2020. After events in January and February 2020, including a reported threat to the claimant and a police report about live bullets left at his doorstep, Mr Eskelsen twice told him not to attend work while a risk assessment was said to be taking place.
The tribunal found that no meaningful risk assessment had in fact been carried out, and that the instruction not to attend work was never revoked during the material period. It rejected the respondent’s case that the claimant was simply absent without leave. The tribunal also accepted that the police had not instructed the claimant not to work, but held that this was not decisive because the respondent itself had told him not to attend and had taken the issue out of his hands. The tribunal found that the burden was on the respondent to provide a safe place of work, and that it had not shown that it had done so.
Applying Part 2 and ss.13 to 27B of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal concluded that the claimant’s wages were properly payable for the period he was following the respondent’s instruction not to attend. It held that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and accepted the claimant’s calculation in the appendix. The respondent was ordered to pay £868.51 gross, subject to any appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned alleged non-payment from 23 February to 2 April 2020 and alleged underpayment during furlough from 1 April to 30 April 2020. At the hearing, counsel confirmed there was no holiday pay claim. | Upheld | — | £869 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £869
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Part 2, ss.13 to 27B ERA 1996
- properly payable wages
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.