Case 3201710/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Reid v The Alchemist — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201710/2023
- Decision date
- 13 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Perry Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Reid
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Reid did not attend the full merits hearing listed on 13 February 2024. The tribunal recorded that he had not provided a telephone number on his ET1, that staff telephoned the last number available from the respondent and left a voicemail, and that staff also emailed him asking him to contact the tribunal. No response was received.
The tribunal also noted that the claimant had not responded to a strike out warning about the unfair dismissal claim sent on 23 October 2023, had not complied with case management orders sent on 15 November 2023, and had not replied to the respondent's application to postpone the hearing or to later correspondence seeking clarification of the amounts claimed. The tribunal said the remaining scope of the case was unclear, including the amounts said to be owed.
Having made practicable enquiries about the absence, the tribunal decided it was proportionate to dismiss the claims and that postponement was not appropriate because there was no evidence that the claimant intended to progress the case. The judgment therefore dismissed the claims under rule 47 and made no merits findings or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify this claim by label in the reasons, but the case listing records breach of contract. The tribunal dismissed the claim under rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the full merits hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify this claim by label in the reasons, but the case listing records unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal dismissed the claim under rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the full merits hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.