Case 3201734/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Kimani v MKQ UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201734/2023
- Decision date
- 16 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Kimani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr G Kimani, brought a wages claim against MKQ UK Limited. The hearing took place by video at East London Hearing Centre on 16 January 2024. The respondent did not appear and the claimant appeared in person.
Employment Judge Moor held that the respondent had unlawfully deducted wages due and owing to the claimant. The judgment records that the sums related to one calendar month's salary and 47 hours of overtime. The tribunal accepted the contractual salary as £35,000 per year and agreed overtime at £20.00 per hour.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,856.67 gross. The appendix shows the calculation as £2,916.67 gross for one month's salary and £940.00 gross for 47 hours of overtime. The judgment states that payment may be made via a PAYE payslip.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent unlawfully deducted wages due and owing from the claimant for one calendar month's salary and 47 hours of overtime. | Upheld | — | £3,857 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,857
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.